What happened in this case?
An appeal in the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit between Hoage and Royal Indemnity Co. The court issued a decision on Apr 5, 1937.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Where this case stands
The side that appealed won, at least for now. The court ruled against the lower court's decision.
In the court's words:
“Upon the entire record we conclude that the decree of the lower court should be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.”
The lower court's ruling no longer stands. The case goes back to the lower court to continue in line with this ruling. This is a published opinion, so it is Binding precedentEarlier authority that a court generally must follow.Learn more about binding precedent → for courts in this circuit.
Plain-English summary, not legal advice. Generated from the court record by fixed rules; quotes are the court's own words. If the record doesn't say, we say so instead of guessing.
Quick answers
Short answers drawn from the court record. If the record doesn't say, we leave it out rather than guess.
An appeal in the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit between Hoage and Royal Indemnity Co. The court issued a decision on Apr 5, 1937.
5 court opinions on Jurvio cite this case, which shows other courts have relied on or discussed it.
The court issued its decision on Apr 5, 1937. The full text of the opinion is available on this page.
Understand this case
Hoage v Royal Indemnity Co. is Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit case number 6687. Jurvio currently provides 1 readable court document for this case.
Opinion type: Majority opinionThe opinion expressing the reasoning supported by most judges deciding the case.Learn more about majority opinion →
Cites 3 cases · all on Jurvio
5 cases on Jurvio cite this case
Available court materials
Court documents Jurvio has for this case. More will appear here as we add them.