What happened in this case?
An appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit between Martinez and Mullen. The court issued a decision on Jul 17, 2015.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Where this case stands
The side that won in the lower court won again. The court left the lower court's decision in place.
In the court's words:
“All we hold today is that there are any number of 3 constitutionally rational grounds for the Commission’s rule, and that one of them 4 is the favoring of licensed dentists at the expense of unlicensed teeth whiteners. 5 6 7 CONCLUSION 8 For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. 9”
The lower court's ruling stands.
Jurvio has no record of a later decision overruling it. Our citation records are not complete, so this is not a guarantee.
Plain-English summary, not legal advice. Generated from the court record by fixed rules; quotes are the court's own words. If the record doesn't say, we say so instead of guessing.
Quick answers
Short answers drawn from the court record. If the record doesn't say, we leave it out rather than guess.
An appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit between Martinez and Mullen. The court issued a decision on Jul 17, 2015.
The latest dated event in the record is “Decision issued” on Jul 17, 2015.
The court issued its decision on Jul 17, 2015. The full text of the opinion is available on this page.
Jul 17, 2015: Decision issued
Understand this case
Martinez v Mullen is United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case number 14-01381. Jurvio currently provides 1 readable court document for this case.
Opinion type: Majority opinionThe opinion expressing the reasoning supported by most judges deciding the case.Learn more about majority opinion →
Cites 17 cases · 4 on Jurvio
Available court materials
Court documents Jurvio has for this case. More will appear here as we add them.