United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v Julius Chow Lieh Liu, No. 10-10613 (9th Cir. 2013)

Docket
10-10613
Decided

Where this case stands

The appeals court threw out the lower court's decision and sent the case back.

Who won?

The side that appealed won, at least for now. The court ruled against the lower court's decision.

What did the court decide?

In the court's words:

“VACATED and REMANDED with instructions. the number of infringing works, in the absence of any evidence suggesting that particular purchase orders found at the Vertex warehouse overstated the quantity of software produced, the court was entitled to rely on the number of sales they reflected.”

From the court's opinion

What does it mean?

The lower court's ruling was wiped out, as if it had not been issued. The case goes back to the lower court to continue in line with this ruling.

Is it still good law?

Jurvio has no record of a later decision overruling it. Our citation records are not complete, so this is not a guarantee.

Plain-English summary, not legal advice. Generated from the court record by fixed rules; quotes are the court's own words. If the record doesn't say, we say so instead of guessing.

Quick answers

What the court record tells us

Short answers drawn from the court record. If the record doesn't say, we leave it out rather than guess.

What happened in this case?

An appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit between United States and Julius Chow Lieh Liu. The court issued a decision on Oct. 1, 2013.

From the court record

Where does the case stand now?

The latest dated event in the record is “Decision issued” on Oct. 1, 2013.

From the court record

What was the ruling or outcome?

The court issued its decision on Oct. 1, 2013. The full text of the opinion is available on this page.

From the court record

What happened most recently?

Oct. 1, 2013: Decision issued

From the court record

Understand this case

Case record

United States v Julius Chow Lieh Liu is United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case number 10-10613. Jurvio currently provides 1 readable court document for this case.

Decision lineup

Opinion type: Majority opinionThe opinion expressing the reasoning supported by most judges deciding the case.Learn more about majority opinion →

Cases cited 50

Cites 50 cases · 8 on Jurvio

Case timeline

  1. Decision issued

Available court materials

Documents and argument

Court opinion

Court documents Jurvio has for this case. More will appear here as we add them.

View available documents →

Read the opinion